Plane Conversations

A business aircraft is a productivity tool. It is no different than any other tool we use in business to become more productive. It has a cost and it brings, or should bring, value. The value has to exceed the cost. If it does then we get a positive rate of return on the investment. If the value does not exceed cost then it is not a good investment.

All of the mainstream and social media conversations about the “extravagance” or “corporate excess” associated with the business jet play well with the anti big business crowds and populist politicians, but they lack substance. So far, these conversations have had nothing to do with the reality of what a business aircraft does to enhance the productivity of a company and its most valuable assets – its people.

The discussion about the value of business aircraft should be all about productivity. If using business aircraft increases the productivity of an organization, and the measured gain in productivity exceeds the cost, then it makes sense. Bottom line!

I just purchased an iPad. I can use this device to increase my productivity in internet research and communications or I can play games on it. How I choose to use it doesn’t make it inherently good or bad. How I use it does determine its value in my personal and business productivity.

In that way, a business jet is no different than an iPad.

Those of us in business aviation need to do a better job of first understanding, and then selling the value proposition of business aircraft as a tool to enhance productivity.

Billions of dollars have been spent in research and development of new high technology aircraft that will take us higher, faster and further on less fuel.  All the while, business aviation has invested very little in the technology to truly measure the enhancement of productivity gained by flying in a private aircraft. It is not just the time saved that we need to measure and quantify. What about the social and physiological experience of travel and its effects on human productivity and creativity?

Additionally, we should invest in the technology to learn how to better utilize the business aircraft to bring the costs down. How do we cut the inefficiencies of business aviation without reducing the experience?

An industry-wide increase in the efficient use of the business aircraft coupled with a measurable understanding of the value would do more than just silence the naysayers. More importantly, it would grow the industry that supports business aviation and bring an innovative increase in the productivity of our economy.

When you go into a store to buy anything, the rational person will always compare the quality of the object against the price of the object versus any alternative products or markets.

When you buy a home, the property is characterized by descriptions for “quality” (construction, neighborhood, schools) and a series of  ”quantities” (number of bedrooms, square footage, price)

When you cross the road, you look both directions in order to assess the quantity and the quality of the traffic that may or may not kill you.  Are the traffic slow moving pedestrians or are they fast moving trucks?

When a bank makes a loan, they “quantify”  all of your valuable things like your home, cars, 401K, and personal income and they use the credit score to measure the quality of your finances (debts, credit pulls, past history, bankruptcies, etc).

Supply and demand cannot, absolutely cannot, be determined by any other means other than by measurements of quantity and quality.

In fact, economics is the science of incentives where the fundamental graph is the supply and demand curve.  Both supply and demand behave according to inputs of quality and quantity, specifically price and availability.  Supply and demand for anything absolutely cannot be determined by any other means than by coordinates of quantity and quality.

Investors manage risk.

Risk is an asset, if it weren’t, insurance companies would not exist.  There are three things that an investor must know in order to manage risk.  1.  They MUST be able to identify their exposure to peril.  2.  They MUST be able to estimate the probability that the peril will or will not impact them.  3.  They MUST be able to determine the cost of the consequences in the event that the peril happens.

Again, within the definition of risk – to which ALL INVESTMENT RESPOND, are the characteristics of an asset; what is the quantity (1) and (3) and what is the quality (2) of the peril.  If the investor does not CLEARLY SEE these three positions, they will not invest. Period.

This is what drives successful markets and what kills unsuccessful markets.

To ignore the fact that all rational human behavior, intentions, decisions, reactions, conversations, relationships, education, ideology and every other state of human consciousness in a market, corporation, community, family, or social network ARE NOT characterized in the form of a quantity and a quality, is frankly, ignorant to ones market, irresponsible to one’s community, and incompetent to one’s profession.

Yet so many people do not see themselves as an asset.  Maybe someone should give people permission.